Scary Videos l Submit your link
Uploaded by: msporny
Video Description:
A short introduction to the semantic web. All source material is on the Digital Bazaar wiki: http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/semantic-web-intro
Tags for this video: manu microformats rdfa semantic sporny web
Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by msporny
Related Videos
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
Intro to the Semantic Web
Uploaded by: msporny
Video Description:
A short introduction to the semantic web. All source material is on the Digital Bazaar wiki: http://wiki.digitalbazaar.com/en/semantic-web-intro
Tags for this video: manu microformats rdfa semantic sporny web
Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by msporny
| Ordering Pizza in the Future | Semantic Web | Semantic Web 3.0 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Tagging Vs The Semantic Web | Web 2.0 | Rules and Semantic Web - Part 1 |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














Right now, Google has to guess as to what the contents of the page are based on keywords in the page.
With the semantic web, Google wouldn't have to guess about the contents of a page because the contents - the "things" - would be explicitly marked up. Google would know it is sending you to the right web page.
In other words - search isn't very exact right now... the semantic web is making it MUCH more exact.
We're not trying to force you to change the way you have to use the web. We're adding semantic information to web pages so that computers will be able to better understand them. If they understand what is on a web page, they will be able to better help you interact with that web page.
Maybe those technologies would need some support from software developers or online applications... and one standard.
Moreover, ontological vocab is still an issue for semantic sharing/markup. I mean, who is responsible for hosting such ontology docs in the web? It would be a chaos if everyone uses their own 'semantics' for the markup.
Sure, Adobe can add symantics support to Dreamweaver, but that will still require extra work for content creators to implement into their sites.
It's a very difficult process to balance power with ease of use, and those who delve deeply into it will have that much more of an edge over everyone else.
one possible solution is fuzzy ontology.
i wonder if one day when this semantics science gets much deeper and mroe advanced, that out computers would get bored of doing stuff for us ^^
It´s fantastic. Many thanks